Is it a Frankenstein-like Amalgam Figure or simply a Kinnikuman Kinkeshi?
Please post your answer in the Comments section below – and even if there is an answer, feel free to corroborate or refute it.
Is it a Frankenstein-like Amalgam Figure or simply a Kinnikuman Kinkeshi?
Please post your answer in the Comments section below – and even if there is an answer, feel free to corroborate or refute it.
Art, Art 100, bootleg, Counterfeit, Frankenstein-like Amalgam Figures
This entry was posted on October 28, 2010, 1:01 pm and is filed under Research, UofM News. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
Fusion theme by digitalnature | powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS) ^
#1 by Eric on October 28, 2010 - 2:56 pm
Looks like Popy Mini Ashuraman.
#2 by Eric on October 28, 2010 - 3:23 pm
Here is a picture i took of a few i have… http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/1998/popyminikinkeshiashuram.jpg
#3 by Lucas on October 28, 2010 - 5:10 pm
The amount of excessive flashing on it alone alludes to it not being a legitimate Kin figure.
As far as the sculpt goes, it would appear to be an amalgam, using parts from various Kin figures, though it is obviously using Ashuraman as it’s basic framework.
Any chance that more detailed photos can be provided?
#4 by The Orgg on October 28, 2010 - 7:33 pm
It looks like a Frankenstein’d figure from the flashing and such, and the detail doesn’t look like any Kinkeshi I’m familiar with.
#5 by Lucas on October 28, 2010 - 10:03 pm
OK, so based on Eric’s pictures, that is a legit sculpt, but it still appears to be a bootleg, like the yellow one he has shown.
#6 by SmokinGun on October 29, 2010 - 12:12 am
Im leaning more to a kinkeshi bootleg. Im not 100% sure but I think I seen this particular sculpt in Kinkeshi lots on YHJ auctions.
#7 by Chad Perry on October 29, 2010 - 8:51 am
It looks like I have my answer – it’s neither.
Thank you to everyone for their help!