For the final M.U.S.C.L.E. commercial there appears to be a far less focused approach. Invasion of the M.U.S.C.L.E. Things thematically attempted to recreate the B-Movie monster trailer, and M.U.S.C.L.E. Invasion Update seemed to have a newsreel approach focusing on the wrestling. For Mattel’s final M.U.S.C.L.E. commercial a linear thematic element is missing.
Some people may argue that “Color” is the theme of the commercial. It is the opinion of the University of M.U.S.C.L.E. that “color” is simply a feature of the product. The previous M.U.S.C.L.E. commercials are more analogous to short vignettes. This third commercial fails to provide the same story. Instead, the commercial simply seems locked into the same style of the previous commercials. The focus seems to rest on continuing aspects of the previous commercials (i.e., shrieking women, stock footage, etc.) in an effort to reinforce the M.U.S.C.L.E. brand instead of the M.U.S.C.L.E. figures.
Perhaps most peculiar is that the commercial starts with a picture of a courtroom and the title, “The People vs. M.U.S.C.L.E.” which suggests that the theme could be either courtroom or judiciously focused. The announcer evens touts that “millions are being captured” as Flesh M.U.S.C.L.E. figures appeared to be jailed. However, the commercial seems to suddenly change direction with the announcement of “M.U.S.C.L.E. part two” and an apparent second title for the commercial. It becomes confusing as to why the judiciary beginning to the commercial is even necessary or why the judge is then brought back in one of the clips. The “Part 2” title seemingly could have been the beginning of the commercial, which would have been a very clear callback to, at least, the original commercial and arguably both of the previous commercials.Instead the commercial simple relies on being similar to the original commercials. Again the announcer appears at the beginning of the commercial. The announcer, shot for the first commercial, appears to be the only piece of footage to appear in all three commercials.
The viewer may believe that the same child appears in all three commercials, but this assumption is false. The costume, hairstyle, and often grainy footage do a commendable job making the child look similar, but the absence of childish sideburns makes the two young faces easier to distinguish. There is one section of the commercial that could be used as potentially a counter argument.At one point the child is carried by a sea of Flesh M.U.S.C.L.E. figures. In a commercial highlighting Color M.U.S.C.L.E. figures this shot seems out of place. A viewer could assume that this shot was originally intended for the first two commercials, but never used. However, upon close inspection the child in the third commercial appears to be different.
In a commercial filled with odd choices, one of the most bizarre is the scene where the child appears to look for M.U.S.C.L.E. figures in his bedroom. Previous M.U.S.C.L.E. commercials had only used a full-color shot during pans of the figures towards the end of the commercial. This bedroom portion is not a panning shot, and is not during the end of the commercial. It is the only full-color shot during the main body of a M.U.S.C.L.E. commercial. Clearly the intent was to highlight the rainbow of figures, but because the figures are “hiding” it actually ends up obscuring the vast majority of figures they seem focused on highlighting.Collectors often question Mattel’s decisions regarding the M.U.S.C.L.E. brand. The benefit of hindsight mixed with an intense love of the M.U.S.C.L.E. brand may cloud the objectiveness of that questioning. However, any viewer of this commercial does not need to even be familiar M.U.S.C.L.E. to question the poor production value. Twice during the commercial an arm can be seen moving the M.U.S.C.L.E. figures. The first appearance of the arm is when the M.U.S.C.L.E. figures are “jailed” and the second appearance is as the figures “explode” through the scoreboard. Sadly the poor quality of the film made it very difficult to capture a clear picture. However, viewing the commercial at full speed makes the arm’s appearance easily viewable.
The sudden appearance of the scoreboard further illustrates the total lack of vision for this commercial. It goes from courtroom to apparent movie squeal and finally ends on a scoreboard pitting M.U.S.C.L.E. and People against each other. In the eyes of the viewer, the question needs to be asked, “Why does M.U.S.C.L.E. have two points?”
– Videos Posted on PhotoBucket By Gilgar.
The People vs. M.U.S.C.L.E. – Part 2 Script:
The people versus M.U.S.C.L.E.. Millions are being captured. America is safe.
Woman
M.U.S.C.L.E. things, what could be worse?
Announcer
M.U.S.C.L.E. part two! They’re orange, they’re green, they’re purple.
Judge
And they’re worse!
Woman
Nooo!
Announcer
M.U.S.C.L.E. things in disguise. They’re hiding everywhere.
Baseball Player
I can’t stand them.
Kid
I can’t stop them!
Announcer
M.U.S.C.L.E. part 2. Hundreds of tiny packs, separately sold. M.U.S.C.L.E. two; people nothing.
The quality of both the concept and production of the commercial leave much to be desired for collectors. However, hardcore Color figure collectors likely view this commercial as the single greatest thirty seconds of video ever uncovered. There are at least six M.U.S.C.L.E. figures that are considered “unproduced.” Additionally, there are, at least, nine figures that are categorized either Class A or Class B.
If there are any questions or concerns, then please email them to the University of M.U.S.C.L.E..
#1 by Muscle on March 3, 2010 - 1:23 pm
Just a note, Green #131 is also a figure previously unseen and considered not to have been produced.
#2 by Chad Perry on March 3, 2010 - 2:28 pm
You are absolutely correct, thank you for the correction. I had it in my notes, but completely missed in my write-up! I’ll make the change as soon as possible.
Mistakes like that are one of my biggest fears for the site, and often the result of rushing to complete an entry. Trying to avoid those mistakes, among other things, has been a big part of the slowdown with daily updates.
#3 by Muscle on March 3, 2010 - 8:13 pm
Also worth mentioning, all the purple figures in the commercial appear to be light Purple. The regular purple is much less translucent and more of a solid purple color.
#4 by Chad Perry on March 4, 2010 - 9:23 am
I would disagree. The Purple color doesn’t appear to be significantly different. Plus there are several factors that impact the color of the entire video, including the Purple figures: personal monitor settings, wear to the original tape, the television settings from which the video was recorded, the lighting of the commercial, post production, etc.
#5 by Johnny on March 4, 2010 - 10:53 pm
It’s entirely possible that the colors are “Technicolor” added to a B/W reel.
#6 by Muscle Things on March 5, 2010 - 3:30 am
Nice frikken update.
I love that lady, “Muscle things, what could be worse?”